This case is pretty much a no-brainer, and the only questionable thing is why the Obama administration...

| | Comments (0)
This case is pretty much a no-brainer, and the only questionable thing is why the Obama administration has forced the issue.  It's very simple: if an organization is explicitly religious, even if it is not a church, and if it believes that contraception violates their beliefs, then it shouldn't be required to provide insurance that includes contraceptive coverage.

The key here is that there is no compelling reason to substantially burden the free exercise of religion, because the government could, for example, easily and simply hand out free contraception, without the insurance coverage paying for it, and that would satisfy the supposed state interest while not burdening the rights of the Little Sisters of the Poor.

Obama is just bullying a bunch of nuns here. G+

Leave a comment

<pudge/*> (pronounced "PudgeGlob") is thousands of posts over many years by Pudge.

"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by pudge published on November 6, 2015 12:31 PM.

There should be a TV drama that takes a lot of major events -- plane exploding over Egypt, cop shooting... was the previous entry in this site.

I flipped the news on and saw Bill O'Reilly yelling "hack" and "liar" at a bemused George Will.  I looked... is the next entry in this site.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.