The New York Times is quite clearly so biased in favor of Clinton -- or against Trump -- that it is ...
The New York Times is quite clearly so biased in favor of Clinton -- or against Trump -- that it is refusing to report on legitimate and serious negative news about her.
We already had the fact about a month ago that in Clinton's first interview response after the Comey hearing about her mishandling of classified information, she told several lies about it, and the Times refused to report on it.
Now, we have the AP story that demonstrates that of her meetings -- other than meetings that are directly a part of her job, such as with government (including foreign government) officials and staff -- a majority of them were with donors to her charitable foundation.
These are big stories. And the Times simply refuses to report on them at all. You would never know about these important stories if you got all of your news from the Times.
"All the news that's fit to print" is a lie.
We already had the fact about a month ago that in Clinton's first interview response after the Comey hearing about her mishandling of classified information, she told several lies about it, and the Times refused to report on it.
Now, we have the AP story that demonstrates that of her meetings -- other than meetings that are directly a part of her job, such as with government (including foreign government) officials and staff -- a majority of them were with donors to her charitable foundation.
These are big stories. And the Times simply refuses to report on them at all. You would never know about these important stories if you got all of your news from the Times.
"All the news that's fit to print" is a lie.
"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."
Leave a comment